People would be much happier if they are doingdifferent types of tasks during their workdaythan doing the same task.

　　With the rapid shifts of metropolises, theimportance of happiness has been increasinglyemphasized by the public. When people arecommenting whether workers would be much happierif they are doing different types of tasks during theirworkday than doing the same task or not, people'sopinions are diverse. With my carefulconsideration, I personally consent to the perspective that workers would be much happier ifthey are doing different types of tasks during their workday than doing the same task. Mythesis could be circumstantiated by the following two reasons. Firstly, doing different types oftasks can help people gain more knowledge to be happier. Secondly, doing different types oftasks can increase working efficiency to make people happier.

　　Firstly, taking the advantage of dealing with various kinds of tasks, people can easily learndiverse aspects of lore, which capacitates them to be contented. As we all know, people canbe more confident and earn more respect when they feel that they are more knowledgeablethan others. In fact, people who possess more knowledge could gain a more trustworthyimpression to others. Because of that, doing multiple types of tasks can help them to earnmore prestige to increase the degree of happiness. For example, while my friend Sherlockteaches three subjects in a university, obtaining a bright mood every day after gaining moreknowledge than other colleagues who major in one subject, my colleague Mycroft alwaysbecomes gloomy dealing with the routine work of being an officer. As a result, Sherlock isoptimistic for his daily work, but Mycroft is not willing to work and finally left his position. Inconclusion, it is necessary to do different types of work to maintain a sanguine mood.

　　Secondly, without the interfering of being bored, people can accomplish the work usinglittle time which can help them gain the sense of achievement and happiness. Engaging a singletask could inevitably encounter the monotony of tediousness, which embosses theadvantage of tasking on multiple jobs. When people doing plethora of taskssimultaneously, the body would reaction this pressure with dopamine secretion which is asubstance for improving the level of excitement during the performance. That is to say, themore tasks that people are engaging in, the higher excitement that people would achieve,which becomes the cause of the hyper-status during work. For instance, while my cousin JohnWatson, dealing with all kinds of works for his own company, can complete the tasks in severalhours because of the excitement of new challenges; his secretary Mr. Holmes, majoring instoring documents, spends several days finishing a simple publicizing document. In the end,John Watson gained great sense of achievements for his efficient work, however, Mr. Holmes isshame of himself for his terrible work. All in all, it is obvious that people can be happier bydoing different types of tasks simultaneously.

　　With the content aforementioned, my thesis could be supported by two reasons which arelearning more knowledge and increasing working efficiency. Thus, it is appropriate to drawthe conclusion that both two reasons could make my thesis reasonable and well-supported.When people are commenting this issue, it is not supported to be forgotten what a famousJapanese claims” Difference creates happiness.”