华南俳烁实业有限公司

當前位置:中華考試網(wǎng) >> 托?荚 >> 托福機經(jīng) >> 寫作機經(jīng) >> 2015年12月5日托福寫作真題回憶(新東方)

2015年12月5日托福寫作真題回憶(新東方)

中華考試網(wǎng)   2015-12-07   【

 Integrated Writing:

  Independent Writing:

  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Government, instead of individuals, should cover Internet fees.

  Despite the huge impact of the Internet, as a convenient tool for educational, vocational and recreational purposes, offering free Internet access should be viewed as a short-sighted, ill- considered proposal. For both personal and commercial concerns, Internet with no charges will inevitably bring about unexpected fallout. Therefore, I hold my point that under no circumstances should the government provide free Internet access for the public.

  First, for the users of Internet, free of charge means declination of quality. So limited is the total bandwidth of Internet access, that more computers and phones connected to the Internet means slower speed for each individual user. Now, as Internet could be available only after payment, those unwilling to spend money on the Internet leaves fairly enough bandwidth for the registered users. However, were Internet free of charge for citizens, almost everyone, whether with urgent or irrelevant aims, would have connected to the Internet for 24 hours 7 days. Then, without doubt, so many citizens watching online videos, downloading large-scale softwares or chatting via video cam with more than 10 friends, the Internet must be slower than those using a primitive 14.4k modem. So, for the rights to access fast enough Internet, government should never make it free.

  Second, for the businesses providing Internet access, free Internet services will ruin their future. As Internet become an essential part for people's life, many companies working on offering fast, stable Internet access become strong business tycoons. For instance, Vodafone, one of the largest Internet service provider, has established 14 branches in different countries and recruited over 1.4 million employees. However, were free Internet service emerged, what would probably happen to these fast-growing business? Internet users, finding ways to download music or send voice mails without any charge, will soon abandon these Internet business sending bills to them every month. Then, not only such business would go bankruptcy, all the staff would thus become unemployed, which could be a huge economic and social disaster for government.

  In conclusion, both considering the privileges for Internet users and the destiny of Internet service providers, I strongly believe that government should never try to make Internet access free.

糾錯評論責編:stone
相關推薦
重點推薦»

book.examw.com

  • 搞定!托福高頻詞匯
    ¥20.00
  • 托福考試官方真題集1(附DVD-ROM)
    ¥112.00
  • 新托福長難句白金課堂(第二版)
    ¥18.00
  • 托福考試閱讀特訓
    ¥55.00
  • 新托福,新起點
    ¥33.00
绥化市| 呈贡县| 苗栗县| 札达县| 景谷| 乌苏市| 宣化县| 昔阳县| 香格里拉县| 友谊县| 泸水县| 泗洪县| 曲麻莱县| 临武县| 时尚| 柞水县| 姚安县| 乐清市| 松潘县| 阜宁县| 会昌县| 青州市| 广昌县| 合阳县| 峨山| 治多县| 临洮县| 肇州县| 宁武县| 兰坪| 剑阁县| 义马市| 新闻| 辉县市| 呼玛县| 呈贡县| 宜都市| 奈曼旗| 电白县| 类乌齐县| 溧阳市|