2019年公共英語三級寫作模擬題：議論文

　　(一)議論文

　　議論文是作者就某個問題或事件發(fā)表自己看法的一種文體。作者旨在通過講事實、擺道理來說明自己的見解、主張，從而使人信服。寫議論文時要特別注意以下幾點:

　　①在段首就必須提出問題和作者的觀點，使讀者明確你的立場;②充分運用邏輯推理來說明自己的觀點，以理服人; ③說明材料(或論據(jù))必須真實可靠，有說服力;④駁斥他人觀點時，應首先承認自己的觀點可能會有人反對，然后再去批駁他人的觀點，這樣才容易獲取他人的信任，使自己的觀點更加真實可靠、有說服力; ⑤結尾句進一步明白無誤地闡述自己的觀點，贏得讀者的贊同。

　　下面以一篇習作《如何解決交通擁擠問題》來看看這種文章的寫法。 ①為解決城市交通擁擠，有人建議建造更多的道路。②有的人則建議開辟更多的公共汽車線路。③我的建議。

　　How to Solve the Problem of Heavy Traffic?

　　With population rapidly increasing，heavy traffic has become a big headache for many cities. For this very reason，many government officials and experts have thought up some solutions，among which two draw much attention the country over.

　　Some people suggest that more and wider roads should be laid down. It is evident that it can relieve the traffic congestion in the streets，thus accelerating the flow of buses and cars. And meanwhile， the fast and smooth flow of traffic reduces the air pollution caused by engine-idling. But the disadvantage of this solution lies in the fact that too much land that could be used for farming or housing will inevitably be occupied by more and more roads. Therefore，others hold that the number of public bus routes should be raised so that more people can be transported and fewer people will have to travel in their own cars or ride bikes. Less use of bicycles and private cars will make the roads less crowded. Unfortunately，there is also a drawback in this solution; it will bring inconvenience to those who live or work far away from bus stops.

　　As neither of the two solutions is effective enough to solve the problem of heavy traffic in cities，I favor a combination of the two. While building more roads in places where land is less useful，we should increase the number of public bus lines. Only in this way can we more efficiently solve the problem of heavy traffic.

　　【譯文】 如何解決交通擁擠的問題

　　隨著人口的迅速增長，交通擁擠已成為許多城市難以解決的問題。正是由于這種原因，許多政府官員以及專家提出了一些解決方案，其中有兩個引起了全國的極大關注。

　　有人建議建造更多更寬的道路。很明顯，這樣會緩解道路交通的擁擠，從而加快車速。同時，快速而又流暢的車輛還會減少由發(fā)動機變速導致的空氣污染。但此種方案的不足之處在于這樣一個事實;建造道路會不可避免地占用過多的土地，而這些土地本來是可以用于耕作或建房的。故此，另一些人主張開辟更多的公共汽車線路，使更多的人不去駕車或騎車，而是讓他們去乘坐公交汽車。這樣一來，也可以降低道路擁擠。不幸的是，它也有缺陷，即給那些遠離公共汽車站的人的生活和工作帶來不便。

　　由于這兩種解決方案都不能有效地解決城市交通擁擠問題，我贊成采取將兩者結合起來的方法。一方面在土地不緊張的地方建造更多的道路，另一方面增加公共汽車線路。只有用這種方法，我們才能更有效地解決交通擁擠問題。當然，我們也可以運用作文模式來寫議

　　論文。

　　作文模式(一)

　　There is no denying the fact that is a popular topic which is much talked about not only by but also by .The reasons for are as follows. To begin with， .Secondly .Therefore we should attach significance to solving this problem. There are，I think，at least two possible ways to copy with it.

　　The first way to tackle it is to appeal to authorities to take measures to .The other way that is worth adopting is to work out new regulations to .Only in this way，can we succeed in solving the problem in the near future.

　　To conclude，it is seems obvious that .So the prospect we are looking forward to will be bright and encouraging.

　　作文模式(二)

　　It’s generally believed that is a hot topic which is widely talked about both at home and abroad. Now our government attaches great importance to solving this problem. Scientists in the filed have put forward a number of suggestions tending to relieve it. To begin with， we should .Further more， .It’s clear that . People，however，differ in opinions on this matter. Some think that .According to them，we should.Others argue that .In their opinion，nobody can ，without .There is no doubt that .As a consequence .

　　In short，I firmly support the view that .It’s because .So my conclusion is that .

　　作文模式(三)

　　As is show in the table(in the picture) dropped(increased) from in 1944to in 1996.According to figures given in the table， has greatly increased(decreased).From the table，we can also see that there has been a sharp decline(rise)in .It’s clear that .

　　There are at least two good reasons. For on the one hand .Let’s have an example to illustrate the great increase in .On the other hand is due to the fact that .In addition， is responsible for .Maybe there are some other reasons to show .But it’s generally believed that the above mentioned reasons are commonly acceptable.

　　As far as I’m concerned，O believed that I’m sure my opinion is both sound and well grounded.