2018年5月19日雅思大作文預(yù)測(cè)：教育與政府

　　題型2 話題分類：教育類 屬性：一級(jí)重點(diǎn)

　　參考題目1

　　制定課程靠政府還是老師The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers...

　　制定課程靠政府還是老師The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. Do you agree or disagree?

　　題型

　　同意與否型

　　解題思路

　　政府制定的必要性1：推廣和普及基礎(chǔ)教育。舉例，必須在全國(guó)范圍推廣關(guān)于國(guó)語(yǔ)和社會(huì)公共法律的課程，這樣能讓每一個(gè)孩子都成為合格的社會(huì)公民，能夠閱讀，也能夠守法。而個(gè)體老師則很可能安裝自己的意愿來(lái)教導(dǎo)學(xué)生，他們可能教的是當(dāng)?shù)氐恼Z(yǔ)言，當(dāng)?shù)氐淖诮桃?guī)則，這些和整個(gè)社會(huì)是不兼容的。政府制定的必要性2：政府掌握著社會(huì)就業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)，它知道社會(huì)需要哪些專業(yè)，不需要哪些專業(yè)。所以政府來(lái)制定教育的話，能保證學(xué)生學(xué)到的知識(shí)和技能是社會(huì)工作真正需要的。老師制定的必要性：老師從來(lái)都戰(zhàn)斗在教育第一線，他們更有經(jīng)驗(yàn)，也更能了解學(xué)生的需求。舉例，老師可以靈活的來(lái)改變和調(diào)整上課的內(nèi)容和方法，目的是讓每一個(gè)學(xué)生都能掌握這節(jié)課的知識(shí)。而政府則不不可能預(yù)測(cè)到這些具體學(xué)習(xí)上的問(wèn)題。

　　范文

　　Who should shoulder the responsibilities of determining the contents of subjects of school education? The government or the preceptors? This issue has been a heated social issue in debate. Personally, I believe the combination of them might be the best solution, and reasons will be expounded as below. Firstly, the government should make efforts in popularization of basic education, which ensures every child can grow up into a regular citizen. For example, it is very wise that the central government forces every elementary school to teach some compulsory subjects like official languages and state’s laws, for the general knowledge can shape all children of new generations, especially the ones in remote or religious areas, into standard people with common languages skills to read news and data in media, as well as law-abiding consciousness to distinguish the right from the wrong. On the contrary, a single teacher is untruthful. In many cases, a local teacher in a religious region prefers instilling local culture elements into minds of children, such as indigenous language exclusive from the national information system, or local culture-based rules that might be incompatible with and even violate the national laws. Another reason why the government should make authoritative decisions in contents of subjects in university stems from a concern of social employment. Obviously, the government is the only social entity that grasps overall data of social employment changes, for example, what subject is eagerly required in companies today, and what subject is too out-of-date to suit the social trend. On this level, it is reasonable to give the government adequate power to decide and adjust plans of education, which can ensure university students master proper professional knowledge, skills and technologies that fully match the practical demands of current social jobs. That is to say, under a government-guided university system, the graduates would be less likely trapped into the unemployment. Nonetheless, the importance of teachers should never be ignored, for the reason that they are frontline staffs, who accumulate abundant teaching experience and a deep understanding of the practical needs of individual students. In fact, studying is a very personal activity, because there is a huge difference in intelligence, talents, and interests among students. In other words, according to feedbacks from students, teachers should have high-level flexibility and adaptability in deciding contents and paces of a particular class, for the purpose of satisfying the studying effectiveness of every individual. The government, however, fails to predict these detailed difficulties and challenges of students in class, so that a unified teaching plan might be too fast or too slow for them. In conclusion, the government and every single pedagogue have unique strengths and weakness in education planning. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the wise measure should be letting them work together to make a perfect resolution.(467字)