2018年5月19日雅思大作文預測：同意與否

　　參考題目4

　　富國是否該幫助窮國 Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should p...

　　富國是否該幫助窮國 Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should provide other types of help. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

　　題型

　　同意與否型

　　解題思路

　　管自己的好處： 1. 國家的稅收和資源都是基于國內(nèi)大眾，所以國家必須首先對國內(nèi)問題負責，否則大眾會認為遭到忽略和歧視，他們會推翻政府。 2. 國外問題太多，缺乏監(jiān)管和法律，那些愛心捐款和物資有可能流入國外官僚的腰包，而沒有起到救助國外窮人的初始目的。 3. 我們國內(nèi)社會需要用錢的方面都已經(jīng)太多，錢用自家都不夠，捐助國外只會引起國內(nèi)弱勢群體的憤怒，增加社會犯罪類。管他人的好處： 1. 很多國外的社會問題都是過去我們國家的某些行動導致的，如戰(zhàn)爭和侵略，所以我們因該對國外的貧窮負責。 2. 很多國外的問題最終會影響到我們的社會，比如說索馬里海盜對于西方海運的威脅。 3. 很多國際問題是不分國界的，比如說國外的環(huán)境污染和疾病會通過自然渠道流入我們國內(nèi)。

　　范文

　　What kinds of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of supporting developing countries? Some people think the best resolution of this issue is simply money. Others, however, refute that other auxiliary measures, instead of finance, are a wiser decision. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view, and the supporting reasons will be presented as below. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory positions, thus lifting the community out of street violence and crimes. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the banking system. Accordingly, what the capital input brings includes vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare. Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high flexibility to buy what they really lack. In fact, practical needs are always variable and unpredictable in different countries, peoples and times, so that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. Therefore, straight money support is indispensable, and its universal effectiveness is always superior to any other goods-based donation. However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy, public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation, there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short, expectedly. Consequently, the final application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better. Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. For example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries for the purpose of educating their future talents. In conclusion, financial aids are always the prerequisite for economy resurgence. To a larger extent, however, money is very confined and even risky, and other applicable assistances, especially the ones related to human resources, should be introduced into impoverished countries.(446字)