2018年5月19日雅思大作文預(yù)測(cè)：討論觀點(diǎn)型

　　參考題目3

　　富國(guó)該如何幫助窮國(guó) Developing countries require help offered by international organization to ensure healthy and sustainable development. S...

　　富國(guó)該如何幫助窮國(guó) Developing countries require help offered by international organization to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　題型

　　討論觀點(diǎn)型

　　解題思路

　　1. 確保政府的運(yùn)行，恢復(fù)銀行業(yè)務(wù)以及對(duì)于企業(yè)的貸款。 2. 金錢是最靈活的援助，它能滿足不同國(guó)家的一切需求，因?yàn)樗�能進(jìn)行購(gòu)買，而實(shí)際的援助很多情況下可能不是窮國(guó)所真正需要的。舉例，給越南大米沒有用，它不缺糧食，它的大米可以自給自足，甚至可以出口。經(jīng)濟(jì)援助的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)： 1. 缺乏監(jiān)管，金錢可能被窮國(guó)的官僚貪污。 2. 會(huì)被用于打內(nèi)戰(zhàn)，這加劇了平窮。 3. 金錢無法買來一切，比如說各個(gè)行業(yè)的人才，教師，醫(yī)生，還有各種相關(guān)的知識(shí)，技能和經(jīng)驗(yàn)。

　　范文

　　What kinds of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of supporting developing countries? Some people think the best resolution of this issue is simply money. Others, however, refute that other auxiliary measures, instead of finance, are a wiser decision. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view, and the supporting reasons will be presented as below. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory positions, thus lifting the community out of street violence and crimes. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the banking system. Accordingly, what the capital input brings includes vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare. Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high flexibility to buy what they really lack. In fact, practical needs are always variable and unpredictable in different countries, peoples and times, so that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. Therefore, straight money support is indispensable, and its universal effectiveness is always superior to any other goods-based donation. However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy, public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation, there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short, expectedly. Consequently, the final application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better. Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. For example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries for the purpose of educating their future talents. In conclusion, financial aids are always the prerequisite for economy resurgence. To a larger extent, however, money is very confined and even risky, and other applicable assistances, especially the ones related to human resources, should be introduced into impoverished countries.(446字)