2018年5月19日雅思大作文預測：多問題型

　　參考題目2

　　高等教育的學費支付辦法 Higher education is funded in several ways: all costs of higher education are paid by the government; all costs are pa...

　　高等教育的學費支付辦法 Higher education is funded in several ways: all costs of higher education are paid by the government; all costs are paid by the student; all costs are paid by students with a government loan which must be repaid after graduation. What are the benefits of these ways and which one is the best?

　　題型

　　多問題型

　　解題思路

　　1. 第一種方案的好處：大學學費全部由政府承擔能普及大學教育，這能讓每一個年輕人都獲取專業(yè)知識，技能，以及法律觀念，最終能提高社會生產力，并且讓社會變得更文明和守法。 2. 第二種方案的好處：大學學費完全由學生負擔能限制大學的學生數(shù)量，這確保了大學教育的質量，比如說更少的師生比率，更小的班級上課，以及一個安靜的校園。 3. 第三種方案的好處：提供學生學費貸款能為年輕人提供一條進入大學的途徑。同時，還貸款的壓力為這些年輕人提供了動力來努力學習。這樣他們才能在畢業(yè)后找到好的工作來還錢。

　　范文

　　Who should shoulder the responsibility of paying for the higher education, the government or the student? Three possible ways for this social issue are proposed. Personally, I believe the best resolution is the third one that allows a student to borrow the loan from the government and repay it after graduation, and my reasons will be displayed as below. The main benefit from the first plan is about the improvement of qualities among the public. The full payment of government for schooling fees makes university education universally available to all individuals, both rich and poor. That is to say, every citizen can be well educated and equipped with professional knowledge, skills, advanced technologies, as well as the concepts about social laws, rules and morality. With these abilities and virtues, these graduates will enhance the social productivity, the creativity in jobs, and make the community gentle, charitable, self-disciplined and law-abiding as well. The second plan primarily increases the quality of university education. Obviously, paying for the higher education at students’ own expense is an ideal method to limit the number of students. That is to say, the atmosphere of the campus is quiet, peaceful and safer, students can attend small-size classes helping them keep focused on the studying, and they also can obtain instructions from professors immediately, in terms of a small faculty-student ratio. Lastly, the third way is favorable for the growth of students. For one thing, the loan from the government can eradicate the financial barriers in the access to the university education, as well as making students away from the concern of taking part-time jobs for making money in college life. For another, the stress of repaying the loan drives them to make most efforts in studying, because this is the only way for them to get good jobs with decent salaries in the future which will enable them to pay the money back after graduation. In my view, the third plan is the best of all, for the reason that it not only integrates the merits of the two former methods, but also motivates students to study and work harder for the repayment. In comparison, there are some demerits from the first and second plans. For example, in terms of the fact that total costs of all universities are incredibly high, the heavy burden of the government would lead to the shortage of budgets on other more urgent social problems, like public health care and environment pollution. Oppositely, if students are required to afford all the fees of the high-level education, many of them will abandon the opportunity and choose to be uneducated. Consequently, an increase in unemployment and social crimes among the young generation can be expected.(451字)