社會(huì)類

　　題目

　　Some people believe that the charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need, wherever they live. Some people believe that the charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in own country instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　Some people believe that the charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need, wherever they live. Some people believe that the charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in own country instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　Philanthropic organizations of developed countries should reach out to the foreign penurious. To assist those in need is to help the almsgivers themselves, since globalization makes nations closely bonded and much more interactive than ever before. Bluetongue, for example, initially found in South Africa, later attacked European countries such as Netherlands, Brazil, France and Germany. Timely provisions by charities to South Africa the medical donations and personnel might have controlled the spread of infections and prevented consequent tragedies.

　　范文

　　Another reason for the charities of the first world to do so is that the laggard regions need more than money. Only with the support from within, backward countries can barely deal with issues concerning education and technology. Well-educated Western pedagogues and advanced textbooks sent by charitable organizations could break the educational vicious circle in underdeveloped countries. What’s more, the introduction of high-tech products such as LED will enable those poverty-stricken areas to foster economy effectively and efficiently.

　　In contrast, for philanthropists in impoverished countries, priorities should be given to recipients of their own regions. It is utopian to look after the penniless around the world, because the budget is limited, and there are simply too many issues to be resolved. Currently, to provide for itself is what can be expected most from the third world, let alone worrying about those better off.

　　In contrast, for philanthropists in impoverished countries, priorities should be given to recipients of their own regions. It is utopian to look after the penniless around the world, because the budget is limited, and there are simply too many issues to be resolved. Currently, to provide for itself is what can be expected most from the third world, let alone worrying about those better off.