华南俳烁实业有限公司

單獨(dú)報(bào)考
當(dāng)前位置:中華考試網(wǎng) >> 高考 >> 全國高考 >> 全國高考英語模擬題 >> 2017年高考英語第一輪復(fù)習(xí)閱讀理解模擬題7

2017年高考英語第一輪復(fù)習(xí)閱讀理解模擬題7

中華考試網(wǎng)  2016-09-08  【

閱讀下列材料,從每題所給的四個(gè)選項(xiàng) (A、B、C和D)中,選出最佳選項(xiàng)。

A

A three-year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation conclusively (and unfortunately), establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception."

A CNN Reporter at the scene states that there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon.

What hit the Pentagon? A Boeing 757 loaded with passengers and fuel right? Who was on Flight 757? According to the Flight Information there were No Arabs on it. That makes me wonder if Flight 757 actually existed at all.

From the pictures and the videos, people can find that there are several doubtful points that need to be taken into consideration, for example the marker line on the grass in the satellite and ground pictures, the different colors of the smoke, the hole which the plane impacted, and the standing pylons (架線塔).

Also, from the comparison of the different pictures, people can find some other strange points. For example, the gear (齒輪) is not the matching one. The wreckage of the plane is not the one from the American Airlines. The glass on the pavement of the pole is another doubtful point. The last thing that need considering is about the collapse. One of the gif video shows the plane impacting the Pentagon. The only problem with this video footage is that it has been altered (改變) and can not be fully trusted.

These crash photos and videos shown here clearly have been doctored (篡改) and don't even match the physics of what happened. So where is the real video? It leaves me many questions. Is this a missile? It is a real enigma.

1. Where can you possibly read this article?

A. In a newspaper. B. In a book. C. In a magazine. D. On a website.

2. What the word “yielded” mean in the first sentence?

A. given in B. surrendered C. produced D. given away

3. Which of the following doubtful points is not mentioned in the passage?

A. the colors of the smoke B. the marker line on the grass

C. the standing pylons D. the model of the plane

4. What is the author’s attitude towards the 911 investigation?

A. Positive. B. Skeptical. C. Neutral. D. NG.

12345
糾錯(cuò)評(píng)論責(zé)編:hanbing
相關(guān)推薦
熱點(diǎn)推薦»
襄城县| 元氏县| 藁城市| 汶上县| 临潭县| 泸定县| 龙岩市| 东源县| 永新县| 河北省| 越西县| 镇江市| 大城县| 苗栗市| 贵港市| 呼和浩特市| 利辛县| 都匀市| 土默特右旗| 若羌县| 乌兰察布市| 聂拉木县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 噶尔县| 嘉峪关市| 虹口区| 泊头市| 微山县| 陆河县| 天长市| 许昌县| 四川省| 武乡县| 巴林左旗| 凌海市| 玛多县| 金坛市| 石棉县| 斗六市| 原平市| 抚松县|