华南俳烁实业有限公司

考試首頁(yè) | 考試用書(shū) | 培訓(xùn)課程 | 模擬考場(chǎng)  
  當(dāng)前位置:考試網(wǎng) >> ACCA/CAT >> CAT考試 >> 文章內(nèi)容
  

ACCA考試輔導(dǎo)練習(xí)(8)

考試網(wǎng)  [ 2017年8月25日 ] 【

Question:

In relation to the law of contract,explain the rules relating to:

(a)acceptance of an offer;

(b)revocation of an offer.

Answer:

This question requires an explanation of the rules relating to the acceptance and revocation of offers in contract law.

(a)Acceptance is necessary for the formation of a contract. Once the offeree has accepted the terms offered, a contract comes into effect. Both parties are bound: the offeror can no longer withdraw their offer, nor can the offeree withdraw their acceptance. The rules relating to acceptance are:

(i)Acceptance must correspond with the terms of the offer. Thus, the offeree must not seek to introduce new contractual terms into their acceptance (Neale v Merrett (1930)).

(ii)A counter-offer does not constitute acceptance (Hyde v Wrench (1840)). Analogously, a conditional acceptance cannot create a contractual relationship (Winn v Bull (1877)).

(iii)Acceptance may be in the form of express words, either oral or written. Alternatively, acceptance may be implied from conduct (Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877)).

(iv)Generally, acceptance must be communicated to the offeror. Consequently, silence cannot amount to acceptance (Felthouse v Bindley (1863)).

(v)Communication of acceptance is not necessary, however, where the offeror has waived the right to receivecommunication. Thus in unilateral contracts, such as Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893), acceptance occurredwhen the offeree performed the required act. Thus, in the Carlill case, Mrs Carlill did not have to inform the Smoke Ball Co that she had used their treatment.

(vi)Where acceptance is communicated through the postal service, then it is complete as soon as the letter, properly addressed and stamped, is posted. The contract is concluded even if the letter subsequently fails to reach the offeror(Adams v Lindsell (1818)). However, the postal rule will only apply where it is in the contemplation of the parties that the post will be used as the means of acceptance. If the parties have negotiated either face to face, in a shop, for example, or over the telephone, then it might not be reasonable for the offeree to use the post as a means ofcommunicating their acceptance and they would not gain the benefit of the postal rule.

The postal rule applies equally to telegrams (Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)). It does not apply, however, when means of instantaneous communication are used (Entores v Miles Far East Corp (1955)).

In order to expressly exclude the operation of the postal rule, the offeror can insist that acceptance is only to be effective on receipt (Holwell Securities v Hughes(1974)). The offeror can also require that acceptance be communicated in a particular manner. Where the offeror does not insist that acceptance can only be made in the stated manner, then acceptance is effective if it is communicated in a way no less advantageous to the offeror (Yates Building Co v J Pulleyn& Sons (1975)).

(b)Revocation is the technical term for the cancellation of an offer and occurs when the offeror withdraws their offer. The rules relating to revocation are:

(i)An offer may be revoked at any time before acceptance. However, once revocation has occurred, it is no longer open to the offeree to accept the original offer (Routledge v Grant (1828)).

(ii)Revocation is not effective until it is actually received by the offeree. This means that the offeror must make sure that the offeree is made aware of the withdrawal of the offer, otherwise it might still be open to the offeree to accept the offer(Byrne v Tienhoven (1880)).

(iii)Communication of revocation may be made through a reliable third party. Where the offeree finds out about thewithdrawal of the offer from a reliable third party, the revocation is effective and the offeree can no longer seek to accept the original offer (Dickinson v Dodds (1876)).

(iv)A promise to keep an offer open is only binding where there is a separate contract to that effect. Such an agreement is known as an option contract, and it must be supported by separate consideration for the promise to keep the offer open.

1 2
本文糾錯(cuò)】【告訴好友】【打印此文】【返回頂部
將考試網(wǎng)添加到收藏夾 | 每次上網(wǎng)自動(dòng)訪問(wèn)考試網(wǎng) | 復(fù)制本頁(yè)地址,傳給QQ/MSN上的好友 | 申請(qǐng)鏈接 TOP
關(guān)于本站  網(wǎng)站聲明  廣告服務(wù)  聯(lián)系方式  站內(nèi)導(dǎo)航
Copyright © 2006-2019 考試網(wǎng)(Examw.com) All Rights Reserved  營(yíng)業(yè)執(zhí)照
盐城市| 姜堰市| 浙江省| 海南省| 静乐县| 名山县| 临朐县| 滨海县| 宜春市| 乌鲁木齐市| 垣曲县| 沐川县| 昌黎县| 柳州市| 同德县| 延寿县| 固原市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 密山市| 阳新县| 获嘉县| 合山市| 大理市| 富宁县| 石嘴山市| 囊谦县| 保山市| 金山区| 汉中市| 通化县| 元江| 女性| 蓝田县| 得荣县| 嫩江县| 黑河市| 绍兴县| 军事| 图片| 木兰县| 平江县|